DILG
Undersecretary austere a. panadero said that of the 16,576 completed BuB
projects, a total of 5,391 or 79% of the 7,282funded projects were completed
for 2013; 9,455 or 48 percent of the 19,525 projects for 2014; and 1,730 or 12
percent of the 14,349 projects for 2015.
BuB is
a program that strengthens participation in national budget formulation and project
implementation. Before BuB, decisions were made at the top. Now, local
communities with their local government units (LGUs) are given the power to
decide on what priority projects should be implemented in their areas.
“BuB as
a reform program has its own birth pains since its conceptualization in 2011
and early stages in 2013 and 2014. Understandably and consequently, the
completion rate takes time in improving through The years as projects differ in
nature from infrastructures to livelihood” said panadero
The
Dilg undersecretary said that over the said three-year period, a total of
51.70billion has been downloaded by the national government to LGUs for the
implementation of a total of 41,156funded projects.
Aside
from the 16,576 completed projects from 2013 to 2015, he said 8,385 are still
ongoing, 11473 are pipelined, and 4722 have been proposed. The completion rate
is 40 percent and the delivery rate is 61.
“We
hope for the appreciation not only of completed projects but as well as
thousands of ongoing projects that has started and has visually verifiable
physical accomplishment,” said panadero.
Gains from BuB
The
undersecretary emphasized the gains of the national government because of the
BuB program. ”the government has improved delivery of basic service, increased
spending of national government funds, increased LGUs’ compliance to full
disclosure policy, public finance management, conformity to the policies of the
commission on audit (COA) , improved civil society organization (CSO)
engagement, and increased investments in poverty alleviation,” he stated.
He said
that national government agencies (NGAs) had the sole discretion in identifying
what kind of projects are needed on the ground. With BuB, NGAs are now attuned
with LGUs.
“in
2015 and 2016, we have fined-tuned the integration of local anti-poverty plans
into the national budget. BuB projects for this year are covered in the 2016
general appropriation act (GAA). About 24.7billion pesos was set aside to fund
14,324 projects this year,” he shared.
The
cities and municipalities covered by BuB program started with 595 in year 2013
and has increased almost three times to 1,514 this year. Next year, it aims to
cover all 1,634 cities and municipalities in the country.
Allocated
budget for BuB program has also leaped from 8.9billion pesos in 2013 to
24.7billion this year.
Dropped, replaced projects
Panadero
said that initially, 49,084 have been identified by LGUs that’s why it is the
figure appearing in the open BuB portal at openbub.gov.ph “but only 41,156
projects are completed, ongoing, pipelined and proposed, while remaining 928
are either ‘totally dropped but replaced’ or
‘totally dropped,’ he said.
He
explained that of the 7,928 dropped projects, 6904
were ‘dropped but replaced’ projects and are part of the 41,156 projects that
are under implementation. On the other hand, 1,024 ‘totally dropped’ projects
are cancelled and unfunded.
”significant
number of projects was dropped especially in the first two years of BuB program
implementation either because projects as proposed were non-feasible or LGUs
failed to submit requirements to national government agencies. Non-feasibility
of projects may be due to lack of land, lack of water source, and insufficient
budget in the original design,” he pointed out.
Meanwhile,
Richard l. villacorte, project manager of the BuB project management office (PMO)
of the dilg explained. “the 6,904 ‘dropped but replaced ‘ should not have been included in the
49,084 total numbers of projects that
appear in the open BuB portal since this is already included in the 41,156
BuB funded projects. The inclusion of ‘dropped but replaced’ projects has led
to double counting. This is a technical
glitch that is now being addressed by the open BuB portal administrators,
housed in the department of budget and management (DBM), and its developers”.
He
added, “The percentage of dropped projects is 2.49 percent from 2913 to 2015.
Dropped projects have significantly been going down, from 7.1 percent in 2013
to 0.3 percent in 2015,”.
BuB DILG
For the
BuB under the dilg, the department managed projects on provision of potable
water supply, local access roads, and disaster risk reduction management (DRRM)
- related projects such as evacuation centers, flood controls, equipment and
rescue vehicles.
As of
march 2016, the dilg completed a total 2,030 projects since 2013 amounting to a
total of 9.201 billion pesos, a performance which is even higher than the
national average.
In
2013, the department downloaded a total of 1.091 billion pesos to LGUs for the
implementation of 694 programmed projects. Of the 694 projects, 629 were
completed composed of 615 potable water projects and 14 infrastructure projects
on drrm, 59 projects are ongoing, and 6 are on procurement process.
In
2014, the department completed1,093 BuB projects out of 1,850 programmed
projects. These include 606 local access road projects, 435 potable water
projects, and 52 drrm-related projects. The department released 2.775 billion
pesos to LGUs in the said year.
Aside
fom 1,093 completed projects in 2014, the dilg is also monitoring 432 ongoing
projects, 212 projects in procurement stage, 99 projects with approved initial
documents, and 14 projects in preparation of feasibility study and other
relevant documents.
Last
year, 308 BuB projects were completed and 648 projects are presently ongoing.
The bulk of the projects are still in the pipeline with 749 on procurement, 497
with approved initial documents and 261
under preparation of initial documents. The dilg downloaded 5.659 billion funds
to LGUs for the implementation of potable water projects and drrm-related
projects.
BuB operational and project cycle
Panadero
pointed out that the projects under the dilg and other government agencies with
the corresponding amounts are identified by the representatives of LGUs and
CSOs at the local poverty reduction action team (lprat) level. These projects
are then submitted to the regional poverty reduction action team (rprat) and
then to the national poverty reduction action team (nprat). The nprat approves
the list and endorses it to the dbm for inclusion in the national expenditure
plan.
For approved
BuB projects included in the general appropriation act (gaa), the concerned LGUs
have to prepare initial documents like feasibility study, program of works
(pow) and cost estimates. Once approved, a memorandum of agreement (moa)
between the dilg and the lgu has to be signed prior to the release of funds.
This stage takes one to three months to complete.
This is
followed by procurement process which takes an average timeline of two to three
months.
On the
other hand, the actual project implementation for water projects takes 18
months to complete for each project. For other infrastructure projects, it
takes six months to two years to be completed.
DILG as
oversight of other government agencies on BuB
Apart
from the BuB dilg project being monitored by the department, panadero said tha
dilg houses the BuB PMO which is responsible for the overall coordination of
the BuB program with te guidance of the BuB executive committee.
The
undersecretary clarified that 14 other government agencies download their funds
to the LGUs. These agencies report their project status to the open BuB portal,
and the department consolidates the overall BuB status. All BuB participating
agencies should be bounded by GAA and exercise due diligence in the
implementation.
The
dilg is a member of the BuB executive committee composed of the heads of the BuB
oversight agencies (dbm, dilg, dswd, napc and neda). The committee is
responsible for setting BuB policies and overseeing program implementation.
Internationally recognized
The BuB
is feat for the Philippine government as well as the Filipino people. It is
internationally recognized by the global initiative for fiscal transparency
(gift) as among the five best practices in fiscal transparency from around the
world and thus given the award in October 2015 in Mexico. The gift declares
that BuB “has so much demand it would
be difficult for future governments to discontinue”.
With
BuB, the 2015 open budget survey ranks the Philippines first in the ASEAN for
fiscal transparency
BuB
also landed in the third place gold award during the open government awards
conducted in New York City on September 23, 2014 by the open government
partnership.
Strengthening BuB
Inspired
by the achievements of BuB program, the government is addressing the gaps and
challenges such as through the simplification of BuB requirements,
strengthening of RPRATs, technical assistance for LGUs thru regional project
management team (rpmt) and capacity development for CSOs. BuB structural
improvements may also be done such as the formulation of tools for evaluation,
enhancing the online portal, and manualizing BuB processes.
For
sustainability, the government is promoting awareness on the beneficial reforms
of BuB, its alleviation of poverty and strengthening of social capital and the
vital role of BuB in realizing the country’s commitment to the united nation’s
sustainable development goals (UN-SDGs). (Bong
Balimbingan – DILG IX)
No comments:
Post a Comment