By Prof Michel
Chossudovsky
Please click related article:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/historic-court-case-against-the-bbcs-cover-up-of-911-evidence/5322983
Deafening silence of the mainstream media. A historic law suit is in making. The BBC will be in the Dock in a British court accused of manipulating the news.
This document requires BBC to show information that is both accurate and impartial.
Global Research,
February 22, 2013
Url of this article:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/ historic-court-hearings-the- bbc-in-the-dock-for- manipulating-evidence-and- biased-coverage-of-the- september-11-2001-attacks/ 5323881
http://www.globalresearch.ca/
Static MAP
|
http://www.globalresearch.ca/historic-court-case-against-the-bbcs-cover-up-of-911-evidence/5322983
Deafening silence of the mainstream media. A historic law suit is in making. The BBC will be in the Dock in a British court accused of manipulating the news.
What is at stake is the BBC’s coverage of
the 9/11 attacks.
On February 25, in the small town of
Horsham in the United Kingdom, there will be a rare and potentially
groundbreaking opportunity for the 9/11 truth movement. Three hours of detailed
9/11 evidence is to be presented and considered in a court of law where the
British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) will be challenged over the inaccurate
and biased manner in which it has portrayed the events and evidence of 9/11.
Over the last 16 months, BBC has been
challenged strongly by individuals in the UK over two documentaries that they
showed in September 2011 as part of the tenth anniversary of 9/11, namely
‘9/11: Conspiracy Road Trip’ and ‘The Conspiracy Files: 9/11 Ten Years On’.
Formal complaints were lodged with BBC over
the inaccuracy and bias of these documentaries, which, according to 9/11
activists, was in breach of the operating requirements of BBC through their
‘Royal Charter and Agreement’ with the British public.
This document requires BBC to show information that is both accurate and impartial.
These complaints were supported by the
US-based educational charity Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
(AE911Truth), which submitted detailed scientific evidence to BBC to buttress
the complaints. The evidence focuses in particular on the confirmed free-fall
of WTC 7 and NIST’s 2008 admission of this fact. In addition, over 300
AE911Truth petition signers supported these complaints by sending letters to
BBC, requesting that BBC show this evidence to the public.
Not a single mainstream media has
acknowledged the court case. and it is highly unlikely that the proceeding will
be the object of unbiased coverage.
Global Research will be covering this event
alongside other alternative media.
We encourage people throughout the UK to
attend these historic hearings.
9/11 Truth is fundamental in disarming “the
war on terrorism” which is a fabrication.
And the BBC through its biased reporting,
not to mention the manipulation of photographic evidence, has acted as an
instrument of war propaganda. It is complicit in war crimes.
As a continuation of this process with the
BBC, documentary film maker Tony Rooke has decided to take a personal stand on
this issue. People in the United Kingdom are required to pay an annual TV
licence fee which is used to fund BBC’s operations. Tony has refused to pay his
TV licence fee on the basis of specific anti-terrorism legislation.
Section 15 of the UK Terrorism Act 2000,
Article 3, states that it is offence to provide funds if there is a reasonable
cause to suspect that those funds may be used for the purposes of terrorism.
Tony’s claim is that BBC has withheld scientific evidence which demonstrates
that the official version of the events of 9/11 is not possible and that BBC
has actively attempted to discredit those people attempting to bring this
evidence to the public. According to Rooke, by doing this, BBC is supporting a
cover-up of the true events of 9/11 and is therefore potentially supporting
those terrorist elements who were involved in certain aspects of 9/11 who have
not yet been identified and held to account.
Rooke has been charged with a crime for not
paying his TV Licence Fee. However, he has lodged a legal challenge to this
charge and has now been successful in being granted an appearance in a
Magistrate’s court, where he has three hours available to present his evidence
to defend himself against the charge. Tony has put together a formidable team
to support him in presenting the evidence, including the following two
outstanding 9/11 researchers:
Tony Rooke has set the stage in the UK for
not paying the TV Licence fee used to fund a media entity routinely involved in
media disinformation and war propaganda.
The evidence about 9/11 that will be
presented by the various individuals above has rarely, if ever, been seen in
any court of law in the United Kingdom, so this court case represents a unique
and valuable opportunity for the 9/11 Truth movement.
The BBC has been on the defensive. It has
not made any statements in anticipation of the court hearings.
One expects that there will be attempts to
block the presentation of evidence on procedural grounds.
Why
is this important?
·
9/11
is the pretext to wage war and repeal civil liberties.
·
The
BBC turn realties upside down. The Lie is portrayed as the Truth.
·
When
the lie becomes the truth there is no turning backwards.
·
The
Lie of the mainstream media including the BBC must be exposed for what it is
and what it does.
·
September
11 has been used profusely by US and its allies as a justification for waging a
preemptive war without borders.
·
The
so-called “War on Terrorism” is a lie.
·
Acts
of war are heralded by the main stream media as “humanitarian interventions”
geared towards restoring democracy.
·
Military
occupation and the killing of civilians are presented by the BBC as
“peace-keeping operations.”
·
This
system relies on the manipulation of public opinion.
·
Millions
of people have been misled regarding the causes and consequences of September
11.
·
Exposing
the BBC is an important step in reversing the tide and dismantling war
propaganda which sustains a criminal military agenda.
The date and location of the hearing are as
follows:
February 25th at 10:00 am
Horsham Magistrates’ Court [Court 3]
The Law Courts Hurst Road
Horsham
West Sussex England RH12 2ET
Tel: 01444 417611
Fax: 01444 472639
Fax: 01444 472639
No comments:
Post a Comment