By Mari
Jeanie Derillo-Santos
NGO
Forum on ADB, an Asian led network of over 250 organizations has expressed its
disappointment on how Asian Development Bank (ADB) sees their lending activity
as ‘politically neutral’. In the meeting between the Management and the Civil
Society Organizations (CSOs), Forum Executive Director Rayyan Hassan directly
asked the question to ADB President Takehiko Nakao “How will ADB ensure the
poorest people in the middle of an oppressive regime or in the face of conflict
derive development outcomes, have access to transparency, dignity, human rights
and accountability from ADB – financed development projects”.
Hassan
made mention of the current situation in the Pacific, where local people are
fighting for rights to self - determination including West Papua. He stated
that 80 countries in Asia where ADB is lending are in some form of conflict
e.g. Sri Lanka, Myanmar, India, Pakistan etc. Although ADB says its development
loans are politically neutral, NGO Forum on ADB disagrees. Hassan added, “Mr.
President in a state of conflict development finance is never politically
neutral - within authoritarian regimes, ADB loans are not politically neutral;
in junta rule, ADB loans are not politically neutral”.
“These
are being hyped as development, but even the private sector is hesitating to
consider it as asset class” Titi Soentoro of Aksi Indonesia. There are a couple
of projects as an evidence of ADB’s co-financed projects falling under bundled
infrastructure and emphasized that these de-risks projects’ bankability, while
the true risk is being born by the natural environment, the local people living
by the project sites, and even future generations.
ADB
President Nakao in his remarks also said, “I would like to ensure that ADB
makes better use of ICT to expedite the disclosure and consultation process. It
will make consultation more effective.” This statement is alarming as an actual
face – to – face consultation might be reduced further to pave way for video –
conferencing type of consultation process. This mechanism is being pushed for
in the guise of efficiency but it often results to a less meaningful
consultation process.
According
to Mr. Apolinar Tolentino of Building and Wood Workers International – Asia
Pacific, “The ADB up to now fails to have a stronger commitment and protection
of workers. It does not have a standalone labor safeguards policy which falls
short as compared with World Bank and the International Finance Corporation at
least in policy principles.” As the ADB is scaling up to large infrastructure
projects, workers’ health and safety remain to be appallingly weak.
In
response, Pres. Nakao retorted that “We can consider (the demand for
stand-alone safeguards on labor).” This forceless response to the ADB President
himself is unacceptable.
Project
concerns on Myanmar, Mongolia, and Georgia were also brought to the attention
of ADB President Nakao during the meeting with CSOs. “In Ulaanbaatar, people
are increasingly getting homeless. They are losing their lands and livelihoods
and health problems are getting rampant,” according to Sukhgerel Dugersuren of
OT Watch. The ADB is supporting a USD 104 million loans to Mongolia on
Ulaanbaatar Urban Services and Ger Areas Development Investment Program. A
complaint is currently lodged at ADB’s Accountability Mechanism now.
Lastly,
Sreedhar Ramamurthi of Environics reminded the Bank about their commitment
regarding the legally binding Paris Agreement and yet the Bank continues to
fund coal, fossil fuels, and other dirty energy, “ADB should have decarbonize 5
years ago, Mr. President. To continue to find justifications for gas, coal and
fossil fuels through a turn of phrase in policy documents is completely
unacceptable,”
No comments:
Post a Comment