REPORTERS WITHOUT BORDERS / REPORTERS SANS FRONTIÈRES
Read the report : click here
Download the 2013 world press freedom map : click here
Lire le rapport : cliquez ici
Télécharger la carte de la liberté de la presse : cliquez ici
Asia-Pacific: 2013 index
Only three Asian countries are in the top 25
percent of the table, while 15 countries are among the bottom 45 places.
Unsurprisingly, one-party authoritarian governments figure more than ever among
the predators of press freedom and languish at the bottom end of the
table.
Burma's paper revolution
Burma went
through dramatic changes in 2012 and moved up to 151th place, a rise of 18
places, jumping ahead of its usual bedfellows in the media repression stakes.
There are no longer any journalists or cyber dissidents in the jails of the old
military dictatorship. Legislative reform has only just begun but the steps
already taken by the government in favour of the media, such as an end to prior
censorship and the permitted return of media organizations from exile, are
significant steps towards genuine freedom of information.
China, Vietnam, Laos, North
Korea: no signs of improvement
North Korea (178th), China (173rd), Vietnam (172nd) and Laos
(168th), all ruled by authoritarian parties, still refuse to grant
their citizens the freedom to be informed. The control of news and information
is a key issue for these government, which are horrified at the prospect of
being open to criticism. North Korea’s leader Kim Jong-un, who succeeded his
father Kim Jong-il on 30 December 2011, appears to rule in concert with the
military junta.
In Vietnam and China, those involved in online news
and information, such as bloggers and netizens, are forced to deal with
increasingly harsh repression. Many Tibetan monks have been convicted or
abducted for having sent information abroad about the disastrous state of human
rights in Tibet. Commercial news outlets and foreign media organizations are
still censored regularly by the propaganda department. Faced with the growing
power of social networks and their ability to muster support, the authorities
have redoubled their efforts to hone their capability to track “sensitive”
content and delete it immediately from the Web. In less than a year, Vietnamese
courts have sentenced 12 bloggers and cyber-dissidents to jail terms of up to
13 years, making the country the world’s second biggest prison for netizens,
after China.
General decline in freedom of
information in South Asia
The Indian subcontinent was the Asian region that
saw the sharpest deterioration in the climate for those involved in news and
information in 2012. In the Maldives, which crashed to 103rd
place (-30), the events that led to the resignation of President Mohammed
Nasheed in February led to violence and threats against journalists in state
television and private media outlets regarded as pro-Nasheed by the coup
leaders.
Attacks on press freedom have increased since then.
Many journalists have been arrested, assaulted and threatened
during anti-government protests. On June 5, the freelance journalist and
blogger Ismail “Hilath” Rasheed narrowly survived the first attempted
murder of a journalist in the archipelago.
Four journalists were killed in India and
Bangladesh in 2012, which fell to 140th and 144th
respectively in the index. In India, the “world’s biggest democracy”, the
authorities insist on censoring the Web and imposing more and more taboos,
while violence against journalists goes unpunished and the regions of Kashmir
and Chhattisgarh become increasingly isolated. Bangladesh is not far behind.
Its journalists are frequently targets of police violence. When they are not
acting as aggressors, the security forces stand by passively while enemies of
the media enjoy impunity and are rarely brought to justice. The killers of the
journalists Sagar Sarowar and Meherun Runi, and those behind the
double murder, remained at large and the investigation was cynically entrusted
to the Rapid Action Battalion where it remains bogged down.
The ability of journalists to work freely in Pakistan
(159th, -8) and Nepal (118th, -12) continued to worsen in the absence of
any government policy to protect media workers. Despite having a diverse and
lively media, Pakistan remains one of the world’s most dangerous countries for
reporters.
Japan resorts to press restrictions
Japan, demoted
from 22nd to 53rd place, recorded the biggest drop of any Asian country. The
reason was the ban imposed by the authorities on independent coverage of any
topic related directly or indirectly to the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi
nuclear power plant. Several freelance journalists who complained that public debate was
being stifled were subjected to censorship, police intimidation and
judicial harassment.
The continued existence of the discriminatory
system of “kisha clubs”, exclusive press clubs which restrict access to
information to their own members, is a key element that could prevent the
country from moving up the index significantly in the near future.
Afghanistan: genuine but fragile improvement
Afghanistan (128th, +22) has a considerably better rating than in previous years,
although violence against journalists did not disappear completely and the
government neglected to tackle the issue of impunity. No journalists were
killed in 2012 and arrests of media workers declined. The withdrawal of some
foreign troops from the international coalition and deteriorating conditions in
neighbouring Pakistan meant these improvements were precarious.
Cambodia and Malaysia: drift towards
authoritarianism
Conditions for the media are critical in Cambodia,
which fell 26 places to 146th in the index, its lowest ever position. Since
2011, news organizations, in particular independent local and foreign radio
stations, have been subjected to a policy of censorship orchestrated by an
increasingly ruthless information ministry. On 1 October 2012, Mam Sonando, the owner
of an independent radio station, was sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment
for insurrection and inciting others to take up arms against the state. The
decline in freedom of information also involved deadly attacks and death
threats aimed at journalists who exposed government corruption and illegal
activities harmful to the environment.
Malaysia (145th)
also presented a sorry record, falling 23 places to a position below the one it
had in 2002. Despite an all-out battle by rights activists and online media
outlets, a campaign of repression by the government, illustrated by the
crackdown on the “Bersih 3.0” protest in April, and repeated censorship
efforts, continue to undermine basic freedoms, in particular the right to
information.
Papua-New Guinea and Fiji: threats against
journalists greeted with indifference
Threats to the media should not be taken lightly in
these two Pacific archipelagos. In Papua-New Guinea (41st, -6), the
security forces are regularly involved in attacks on journalists. In Fiji
(107th), despite a 10-place rise explained in part by the decline of other
countries in this section of the index, news organizations are threatened under
the Media Industry Development Decree with exorbitant fines, or even
imprisonment, as in the case of a recently convicted editor of the Fiji
Times.
2013 WORLD PRESS FREEDOM INDEX
Dashed hopes follow spring
After the “Arab springs”
and other protest movements that prompted many rises and falls in last year’s
index, the 2013 Reporters Without Borders World Press Freedom Index marks a
return to a more usual configuration.
The ranking of most countries is
no longer attributable to dramatic political developments. This year’s index is
a better reflection of the attitudes and intentions of governments towards
media freedom in the medium or long term.
The same three European countries that headed the index last year hold the top three positions again this year. For the third year running, Finland has distinguished itself as the country that most respects media freedom. It is followed by the Netherlands and Norway.
Although many criteria are considered, ranging from legislation to violence against journalists, democratic countries occupy the top of the index while dictatorial countries occupy the last three positions. Again it is the same three as last year – Turkmenistan, North Korea and Eritrea.
“The Press Freedom Index published by Reporters Without Borders does not take direct account of the kind of political system but it is clear that democracies provide better protection for the freedom to produce and circulate accurate news and information than countries where human rights are flouted,” Reporters Without Borders secretary-general Christophe Deloire said.
“In dictatorships, news providers and their families are exposed to ruthless reprisals, while in democracies news providers have to cope with the media’s economic crises and conflicts of interest. While their situation is not always comparable, we should pay tribute to all those who resist pressure whether it is aggressively focused or diffuse.”
Reporters Without Borders launches media freedom "indicator"
Coinciding with the release of its 2013 Press Freedom Index, Reporters Without Borders is for the first time publishing an annual global “indicator” of worldwide media freedom. This new analytic tool measures the overall level of freedom of information in the world and the performance of the world’s governments in their entirety as regards this key freedom.
In view of the emergence of new technologies and the interdependence of governments and peoples, the freedom to produce and circulate news and information needs to be evaluated at the planetary as well as national level. Today, in 2013, the media freedom “indicator” stands at 3395, a point of reference for the years to come.
The indicator can also be broken down by region and, by means of weighting based on the population of each region, can be used to produce a score from zero to 100 in which zero represents total respect for media freedom. This produces a score of 17.5 for Europe, 30.0 for the Americas, 34.3 for Africa, 42.2 for Asia-Pacific and 45.3 for the former Soviet republics. Despite the Arab springs, the Middle East and North Africa region comes last with 48.5.
The high number of journalists and netizens killed in the course of their work in 2012 (the deadliest year ever registered by Reporters Without Borders in its annual roundup), naturally had an a significant impact on the ranking of the countries where these murders took place, above all Somalia (175th, -11), Syria (176th, 0), Mexico (153rd, -4) and Pakistan (159th, -8).
From top to bottom
The Nordic countries have again demonstrated their ability to maintain an optimal environment for news providers. Finland (1st, 0), Netherlands (2nd, +1) and Norway (3rd, -2) have held on to the first three places. Canada (20th, -10) only just avoided dropping out of the top 20. Andorra (5th) and Liechtenstein (7th) have entered the index for the first time just behind the three leaders.
At the other end of the index, the same three countries as ever – Turkmenistan, North Korea and Eritrea – occupy the last three places in the index. Kim Jong-un’s arrival at the head of the Hermit Kingdom has not in any way changed the regime’s absolute control of news and information. Eritrea (179th, 0), which was recently shaken by a brief mutiny by soldiers at the information ministry, continues to be a vast open prison for its people and lets journalists die in detention. Despite its reformist discourse, the Turkmen regime has not yielded an inch of its totalitarian control of the media.
For the second year running, the bottom three countries are immediately preceded by Syria (176th, 0), where a deadly information war is being waged, and Somalia (175th, -11), which has had a deadly year for journalists. Iran (174th, +1), China (173rd, +1), Vietnam (unchanged at 172nd), Cuba (171st, -4), Sudan (170th, 0) and Yemen (169th, +2) complete the list of the ten countries that respect media freedom least. Not content with imprisoning journalists and netizens, Iran also harasses the relatives of journalists, including the relatives of those who are abroad.
Big rises...
Malawi (75th, +71) registered the biggest leap in the index, almost returning to the position it held before the excesses at the end of the Mutharika administration. Côte d’Ivoire (96th, +63), which is emerging from the post-electoral crisis between the supporters of Laurent Gbagbo and Alassane Ouattara, has also soared, attaining its best position since 2003. Burma (151st, +18) continued the ascent begun in last year’s index. Previously, it had been in the bottom 15 every year since 2002 but now, thanks to the Burmese spring’s unprecedented reforms, it has reached its best-ever position. Afghanistan (128th, +22) also registered a significant rise thanks to the fact that no journalists are in prison. It is nonetheless facing many challenges, especially with the withdrawal of foreign troops.
...and big falls
Mali (99th, -74) registered the biggest fall in the index as a result of all the turmoil in 2012. The military coup in Bamako on 22 March and the north’s takeover by armed Islamists and Tuareg separatists exposed the media in the north to censorship and violence. Tanzania (70th, -36) sank more than 30 places because, in the space of four months, a journalist was killed while covering a demonstration and another was murdered.
Buffeted by social and economic protests, the Sultanate of Oman (141st) sank 24 places, the biggest fall in the Middle East and North Africa in 2012. Some 50 netizens and bloggers were prosecuted on lèse majesté or cyber-crime charges in 2012. No fewer than 28 were convicted in December alone, in trials that trampled on defence rights.
Journalists in Israel (112th, -20) enjoy real freedom of expression despite the existence of military censorship but the country fell in the index because of the Israeli military’s targeting of journalists in the Palestinian Territories.
In Asia, Japan (53rd, -31) has been affected by a lack of transparency and almost zero respect for access to information on subjects directly or indirectly related to Fukushima. This sharp fall should sound an alarm. Malaysia (145th, -23) has fallen to its lowest-ever position because access to information is becoming more andmore limited. The same situation prevails in Cambodia (143rd, -26), where authoritarianism and censorship are on the increase.
Macedonia
(116th, -22) has also fallen more than 20 places following the arbitrary
withdrawal of media licences and deterioration in the environment for
journalists.
Varied impact of major protest movements
Last year’s index was marked by the Arab spring’s major news developments and the heavy price paid by those covering the protest movements. A range of scenarios has been seen in 2012, including countries such as Tunisia, Egypt and Libya, where regime change has taken place, countries such as Syria and Bahrain where uprisings and the resulting repression are still ongoing, and countries such as Morocco, Algeria, Oman, Jordan and Saudi Arabia, where the authorities have used promises and compromise to defuse calls for political and/or social and economic change.
Some of the new governments spawned by these protests movements have turned on the journalists and netizens who covered these movements’ demands and aspirations for more freedom. What with legal voids, arbitrary appointments of state media chiefs, physical attacks, trials and a lack of transparency, Tunisia (138th, -4) and Egypt (158th, +8) have remained at a deplorable level in the index and have highlighted the stumbling blocks that Libya (131st, +23) should avoid in order to maintain its transition to a free press.
The deadliest country for journalists in 2012 was Syria (176th, 0), where journalists and netizens are the victims of an information war waged by both the Assad regime, which stops at nothing in order to crack down and impose a news blackout, and by opposition factions that are increasingly intolerant of dissent. In Bahrain (165th, +8) the repression let up slightly, while in Yemen (169th, +2) the prospects continue to be disturbing despite a change of government. Oman (141st, -24) fell sharply because of a wave of arrests of netizens.
Other countries hit by protests saw changes for the better and worse. Vietnam (172nd, 0) failed to recover the six places it lost in the previous index. The world’s second biggest prison for netizens, it has remained in the bottom ten. Uganda (104th, +35) has recovered a more appropriate position although it has not gone back to where it was before cracking down on protests in 2011.
Azerbaijan (156th, +6) and Belarus (157th, +11) both fell last year after using violence to suppress opposition demonstrations and this year they just moved back towards their appalling former positions. Chile (60th, +20) is beginning to recover after plummeting 33 places to 80th in last year’s index.
Political instability puts journalists in the eye of the storm
Political instability often has a divisive effect on the media and makes it very difficult to produce independently-reported news and information. In such situations, threats and physical attacks on journalists and staff purges are common. Maldives (103rd, -30) fell sharply after the president’s removal in an alleged coup, followed by threats and attacks on journalists regarded as his supporters. In Paraguay (91st, -11), the president’s removal in a parliamentary “coup” on 22 June 2012 had a big impact on state-owned broadcasting, with a wave of arbitrary dismissals against a backdrop of unfair frequency allocation.
Guinea-Bissau (92nd, -17) fell sharply because the army overthrew the government between the first and second rounds of a presidential election and imposed military censorship on the media. In Mali (99th, -74), a military coup fuelled tension, many journalists were physically attacked in the capital and the army now controls the state-owned media. This index does not reflect the January 2013 turmoil in the Central African Republic (65th, -3) but its impact on media freedom is already a source of extreme concern.
“Regional models” found wanting
In almost all parts of the world, influential countries that are regarded as “regional models” have fallen in the index. Brazil (108th, -9), South America’s economic engine, continued last year’s fall because five journalists were killed in 2012 and because of persistent problems affecting media pluralism.
In Asia, India (140th, -9) is at its lowest since 2002 because of increasing impunity for violence against journalists and because Internet censorship continues to grow. China (173rd, +1) shows no sign of improving. Its prisons still hold many journalists and netizens, while increasingly unpopular Internet censorship continues to be a major obstacle to access to information.
In Eastern Europe, Russia (148th, -6) has fallen again because, since Vladimir Putin’s return to the presidency, repression has been stepped up in response to an unprecedented wave of opposition protests. The country also continues to be marked by the unacceptable failure to punish all those who have murdered or attacked journalists. The political importance of Turkey (154th, -6) has grown even more because of the armed conflict in neighbouring Syria but it has again fallen in the index. It is currently the world’s biggest prison for journalists, especially those who express views critical of the authorities on the Kurdish issue.
There is no comparison with South Africa (52nd, -10), where freedom of information is a reality. It still has a respectable ranking but it has been slipping steadily in the index and, for the first time, is no longer in the top 50. Investigative journalism is threatened by the Protection of State Information Bill.
Democracies that stall or go into reverse
The situation is unchanged for much of the European Union. Sixteen of its members are still in the top 30. But the European model is unravelling. The bad legislation seen in 2011 continued, especially in Italy (57th, +4), where defamation has yet to be decriminalized and state agencies make dangerous use of gag laws. Hungary (56th, -16) is still paying the price of its repressive legislative reforms, which had a major impact on the way journalists work. But Greece’s dramatic fall (84th, -14) is even more disturbing. The social and professional environment for its journalists, who are exposed to public condemnation and violence from both extremist groups and the police, is disastrous.
Japan (53rd, -31) plummeted because of censorship of nuclear industry coverage and its failure to reform the “kisha club” system. This is an alarming fall for a country that usually has a good ranking. Argentina (54th, -7) fell amid growing tension and clashes between the government and certain privately-owned media about a new law regulating the broadcast media.
No comments:
Post a Comment